7 Comments

I do think it's interesting to show the process. I once attended an exhibit of Ansel Adams' early work. And boy, did he make a lot of awful images! But they also included a few masterpieces, and you could see the evolution, to a degree. I liked being able to see all that.

One difference is, your outtakes are a lot better than his first ones!

Last comment. In the referenced post a number of the triptychs were composed with different lines. I personally prefer those to images that are Very Very similar, on the same horizon but at a just slightly different angle. For what it's worth.

Expand full comment

Are these your out takes?

Expand full comment
author

Yes, in this series I show my photos. So you can see how this photography project evolves.

Expand full comment

Oh. Why would you show your misses? That explains a lot.

Expand full comment
author

I wouldn't call them misses. It's just all kindsm of directions I want to explore in order to find what is the right outcome for me. What does it explain for you?

Expand full comment

What does it explain for me? I don't understand your phrasing. Just because you took a picture doesn't mean you should publish it or show it to other people. That's exploration.

Expand full comment
deletedOct 8
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

Yes, I know those photos by Koudelka. Beautiful.

Expand full comment